Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) in Germany: insights and clinical outcomes from the K-APAT cohort study.

PURPOSE: Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) offers several key advantages, including enhanced patient quality of life, reduced healthcare costs, and a potential reduction of nosocomial infections. It is acknowledged for its safety and effectiveness. This study provides the first systematic clinical data for Germany, where OPAT has not yet been widely adopted. The aim is to establish a foundational reference point for further research and integration of OPAT into the German healthcare system. METHODS: This prospective observational study descriptively analyses data obtained from a cohort of patients receiving OPAT. Both in- and outpatients from all medical specialties could be recruited. Patients administered the anti-infective medications themselves at home using elastomeric pumps. RESULTS: 77 patients received OPAT, with a median duration of 15 days and saving 1782 inpatient days. The most frequently treated entities were orthopaedic infections (n = 20, 26%), S. aureus bloodstream infection (n = 16, 21%) and infectious endocarditis (n = 11, 14%). The most frequently applied drugs were flucloxacillin (n = 18, 23%), penicillin G (n = 13, 17%) and ceftriaxone (n = 10; 13%). Only 5% of patients (n = 4) reported to have missed more than one outpatient dose (max. 3 per patient). Only one catheter-related adverse event required medical intervention, and there were no catheter-related infections. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates that OPAT can be safely conducted in Germany. In preparation for its broader implementation, crucial next steps include creating medical guidelines, fostering interdisciplinary and inter-sectoral communication, as well as creating financial and structural regulations that facilitate and encourage the adoption of OPAT. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04002453.

Efficacy and safety of an early oral switch in low-risk Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection (SABATO): an international, open-label, parallel-group, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection is treated with at least 14 days of intravenous antimicrobials. We assessed the efficacy and safety of an early switch to oral therapy in patients at low risk for complications related to S aureus bloodstream infection. METHODS: In this international, open-label, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial done in 31 tertiary care hospitals in Germany, France, the Netherlands, and Spain, adult patients with low-risk S aureus bloodstream infection were randomly assigned after 5-7 days of intravenous antimicrobial therapy to oral antimicrobial therapy or to continue intravenous standard therapy. Randomisation was done via a central web-based system, using permuted blocks of varying length, and stratified by study centre. The main exclusion criteria were signs and symptoms of complicated S aureus bloodstream infection, non-removable foreign devices, and severe comorbidity. The composite primary endpoint was the occurrence of any complication related to S aureus bloodstream infection (relapsing S aureus bloodstream infection, deep-seated infection, and mortality attributable to infection) within 90 days, assessed in the intention-to-treat population by clinical assessors who were masked to treatment assignment. Adverse events were assessed in all participants who received at least one dose of study medication (safety population). Due to slow recruitment, the scientific advisory committee decided on Jan 15, 2018, to stop the trial after 215 participants were randomly assigned (planned sample size was 430 participants) and to convert the planned interim analysis into the final analysis. The decision was taken without knowledge of outcome data, at a time when 126 participants were enrolled. The new sample size accommodated a non-inferiority margin of 10%; to claim non-inferiority, the upper bound of the 95% CI for the treatment difference (stratified by centre) had to be below 10 percentage points. The trial is closed to recruitment and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01792804), the German Clinical trials register (DRKS00004741), and EudraCT (2013-000577-77). FINDINGS: Of 5063 patients with S aureus bloodstream infection assessed for eligibility, 213 were randomly assigned to switch to oral therapy (n=108) or to continue intravenous therapy (n=105). Mean age was 63·5 (SD 17·2) years and 148 (69%) participants were male and 65 (31%) were female. In the oral switch group, 14 (13%) participants met the primary endpoint versus 13 (12%) in the intravenous group, with a treatment difference of 0·7 percentage points (95% CI -7·8 to 9·1; p=0·013). In the oral switch group, 36 (34%) of 107 participants in the safety population had at least one serious adverse event compared with 27 (26%) of 103 participants in the intravenous group (p=0·29). INTERPRETATION: Oral switch antimicrobial therapy was non-inferior to intravenous standard therapy in participants with low-risk S aureus bloodstream infection. However, it is necessary to carefully assess patients for signs and symptoms of complicated S aureus bloodstream infection at the time of presentation and thereafter before considering early oral switch therapy. FUNDING: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. TRANSLATIONS: For the German, Spanish, French and Dutch translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Flucloxacillin and cefazolin for treatment of Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection.

PURPOSE: Antistaphylococcal penicillins and cefazolin have been used as first line therapy in Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection. While efficacy of both regimens seems to be similar, the compounds may differ with regard to tolerability. This study aims to describe the clinical use of cefazolin and flucloxacillin, focussing on discontinuation or change of anti-infective agent due to adverse events. METHODS: This observational prospective study was conducted at two German tertiary care centres with an internal recommendation of flucloxacillin for MSSA-BSI in one, and of cefazolin in the other centre. Adverse events were registered weekly under treatment and at a 90-day follow-up. Descriptive analysis was complemented by a propensity score analysis comparing adverse events (stratified rank-based test applied to the sum of Common Terminology Criteria for adverse events ratings per patient). RESULTS: Of 71 patients included, therapy was initiated with flucloxacillin in 56 (79%), and with cefazolin in 15 (21%). The propensity score analysis indicates a statistically significant difference concerning the severity of adverse events between the treatment groups in favour of cefazolin (p = 0.019). Adverse events led to discontinuation of flucloxacillin in 7 individuals (13% of all patients receiving flucloxacillin). Clinical outcome was not different among treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Using cefazolin rather than flucloxacillin as a first line agent for treatment of MSSA-BSI is supported by these clinical data.

Surgery for Vertebral Osteomyelitis Lowers 1-Year Mortality and Failure Rates Compared with Nonsurgical Treatment: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine differences between patients who underwent surgical treatment and those who underwent nonsurgical treatment of vertebral osteomyelitis (VO) and to identify potential factors influencing treatment failure (death and/or recurrence within 1 year). METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of clinical data prospectively collected from patients treated for VO between 2008 and 2020. The decision between surgical and nonsurgical treatment was made for each patient based on defined criteria. A 1:1 propensity score matching was performed to exclude confounders between the 2 treatments. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to identify potential risk factors for death and/or recurrence within the first year after VO diagnosis. RESULTS: Forty-two patients (11.8%) were treated nonsurgically and 313 patients (88.2%) underwent surgery. A higher percentage of the surgically treated patients than the nonsurgically treated patients had an American Society of Anesthesiologists score of >2 (69.0% versus 47.5%; p = 0.007), and the thoracic spine was affected more often in the surgical group (30.4% versus 11.9%; p = 0.013). Endocarditis was detected significantly more often in the nonsurgically treated patients (14.3% versus 4.2%; p = 0.018). The recurrence rate was 3 times higher in the nonsurgically treated patients (16.7% versus 5.4%; p = 0.017), but this difference was no longer detectable after propensity matching. After matching, the nonsurgically treated patients showed an almost 7-fold higher 1-year mortality rate (25.0% versus 3.7%; p = 0.018) and an almost 3-fold higher rate of treatment failure (42.9% versus 14.8%; p = 0.022). Multivariable analysis revealed nonsurgical treatment and bacteremia to be independent risk factors for treatment failure. CONCLUSIONS: In our matched cohort of patients with VO, surgical intervention resulted in a significantly lower rate of treatment failure (death and/or recurrence within 1 year) compared with nonsurgical intervention. Furthermore, nonsurgical treatment was an independent risk factor for treatment failure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Risk Factors for Neurologic Deficits in Patients With Spinal Epidural Abscess: An Analysis of One-Hundred-Forty Cases.

STUDY DESIGN: retrospective study. OBJECTIVES: In addition to surgical treatment of spinal epidural abscesses (SEA), a conservative, medical treatment for patients without acute neurologic deficits has been proposed. However, the risk factors for neurologic deficits are unclear. This study aims to identify factors predisposing patients with SEA to neurological impairment. METHODS: All patients treated for SEA between 2008 and 2021 were identified from a prospective vertebral-osteomyelitis registry of a tertiary referral centre. Patient demographics, comorbidities, pathogens, degree of osseous destruction, location of SEA and preoperative neurologic status were retrospectively collected. Differences between patients with (Group 1) and without (Group 2) pretreatment neurologic deficits were assessed by univariate and logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 140 patients with SEA were included. Forty-three patients (31%) had a neurologic deficit and 97 patients (69%) had no neurologic deficit prior to therapy. The prevalence of diabetes mellitus (35% vs 19%, P = .03), median visual analogue scale leg pain (8 vs 5, P = .01), median American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Score (3 vs 2.6, P = .003) and mean Body-Mass-Index (29 vs 26, P = .02) differed between Group 1 and 2 in univariate analysis. In multivariable analysis, diabetes mellitus (odds ratio = 2.7), female sex (odds ratio = 2.5) and ASA-Score (odds ratio = 2.4) were significant contributors for neurologic deficits. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with a SEA without neurologic deficits, the ASA score and diabetes mellitus should be considered, especially in female patients. These patients may be at a higher risk for developing a neurologic deficit and may benefit from an early surgical treatment.

Determining threshold values for success after surgical treatment of lumbar spondylodiscitis using quality of life scores.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine threshold values of validated quality of life (QoL) scores, including Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI), for predicting a successful outcome following surgical treatment of lumbar spondylodiscitis (LS). METHODS: Patients with lumbar spondylodiscitis (LS) undergoing surgery in a tertiary referral hospital were included prospectively from 2008-2019. Data were collected both before surgery (T0) and one year after surgery (T1). QoL was measured using ODI and COMI. The successful clinical outcome was defined by the combination of the following four criteria: no recurrence of spondylodiscitis, back pain ≤4 on visual analogue scale or relief of ≥3 points, absence of LS-related neurological deficit, and radiological fusion of the affected segment. For subgroup analysis, group 1 consisted of patients with a favorable treatment outcome (meeting all four criteria), while group 2 included patients with unfavorable treatment outcome (meeting ≤3 criteria). RESULTS: Ninety-two LS patients (median age = 66 years; age range = 57-74) were analyzed. QoL scores improved significantly. Threshold values for the ODI and COMI were calculated at 35 and 4.2 points, respectively. The area under curve for the ODI was 0.856 (95%-CI 0.767- 0.945; P<0.001) and 0.839 (95% CI-0.749-0.928; P<0.001) for the COMI score. Eighty percent of patients achieved a favorable outcome. CONCLUSION: Objective measurement and evaluation of successful surgical treatment of spondylodiscitis require defined thresholds of quality of life scores. We were able to define such thresholds for Oswestry Disability Index and Core Outcome Measures Index. These can be useful to assess clinically relevant changes and therefore allow a more precise estimation of the post-surgical outcome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, Prognostic study.

Patients with Artificial Heart Valves.

BACKGROUND: In Germany, a total of 38 547 heart valve procedures were performed in 2022. With a growing number of patients undergoing the surgical and interventional implantation of heart valves, the incidence of prosthetic endocarditis is also rising. METHODS: We summarize the current state of the prophylaxis, diagnosis, and treatment of prosthetic endocarditis in a selective review of the literature. RESULTS: Prosthetic endocarditis accounts for 10-30% of all cases of endocarditis. As its echocardiographic and microbiologic findings are often less specific than those of native endocarditis, its diagnosis now increasingly relies on alternative imaging modalities such as F-18-FDG PET-CT. Anti-infective and surgical treatment are made more difficult by biofilm formation on the prosthetic valve and the frequent formation of perivalvular abscesses. CONCLUSION: Increased awareness of this clinical entity in the outpatient setting will promote the earlier initiation of appropriate diagnostic studies. Proper diagnostic evaluation is an essential prerequisite for the early detection and timely treatment of prosthetic endocarditis, with the goal of preventing progressive destruction and thus improving the outcome. Preventive and educative measures should be intensified, and certified, multidisciplinary endocarditis teams should be established. Antibiotic prophylaxis is now given much more restrictively than in earlier years; the risk of infection must be weighed against the potential development of both individual and collective resistance to antibiotic drugs.

[Sex in infectious diseases-How sex differences influence the immune response to infections]. / Das Geschlecht in der Infektiologie ­ wie Geschlechtsunterschiede die Immunantwort auf Infektionen beeinflussen.

The humoral and cellular immune responses to antigen stimulation, vaccinations and infections differ between women and men. Genetic, epigenetic and hormonal factors contribute to the sex-specific immunity. The expression of genes on the X­chromosome and the effect of sex hormones substantially influence the immune defence against infections. Females show stronger cellular and humoral immune responses to infections than males, but the enhanced immune response often leads to aberrant inflammatory reactions and autoimmune diseases. Men are principally more prone to bacterial, viral and fungal infections and more often show severe disease courses. In contrast, a more reactive female immune system results in significantly more adverse reactions to vaccinations. In order to be able to better identify the multiple sex-specific that have an influence on the immune system, sex-specific differences should be investigated in a differentiated way. The better understanding of the sex-specific differences in the immune response will have a long-term influence on the prevention, diagnostics and treatment of infectious diseases, and will ultimately contribute to improving healthcare of both women and men.

Clinical features and outcome of vertebral osteomyelitis after spinal injection: is it worth the price?

PURPOSE: Spinal injections are increasingly used for back pain treatment. Vertebral osteomyelitis (VO) after spinal injection (SIVO) is rare, but patient characteristics and outcome have not been well characterized. The aim of this study was to assess patient characteristics of SIVO in comparison to patients with native vertebral osteomyelitis (NVO) and to determine predictors for 1-year survival. METHODS: This is a single-center cohort study from a tertiary referral hospital. This is a retrospective analysis of Patients with VO who were prospectively enrolled into a spine registry from 2008 to 2019. Student's t-test, Kruskal-Wallis test or Chi-square test were applied for group comparisons. Survival analysis was performed using a log-rank test and a multivariable Cox regression model. RESULTS: 283 VO patients were enrolled in the study, of whom 44 (15.5%) had SIVO and 239 (84.5%) NVO. Patients with SIVO were significantly younger, had a lower Charlson comorbidity index and a shorter hospital stay compared to NVO. They also showed a higher rate of psoas abscesses and spinal empyema (38.6% [SIVO] vs. 20.9% [NVO]). Staphylococcus aureus (27%) and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) (25%) were equally often detected in SIVO while S. aureus was more frequently than CNS in NVO (38.1% vs. 7.9%).Patients with SIVO (P = 0.04) had a higher 1-year survival rate (Fig. 1). After multivariate analysis, ASA score was associated with a lower 1-year survival in VO. CONCLUSION: The results from this study emphasize unique clinical features of SIVO, which warrant that SIVO should be estimated as a separate entity of VO.

Spondylodiscitis in Geriatric Patients: What Are the Issues?

STUDY DESIGN: Review article. OBJECTIVES: A review of literature on the treatment of pyogenic spondylodiscitis in geriatric patients was performed with the aim to give an overview about these special patients and a recommendation on necessary diagnostics as well as conservative and operative treatment options. METHODS: A systematic computerized literature search was done by the spondylodiscitis working group of the German Society for Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery. RESULTS: Spondylodiscitis has an increasing incidence by age with a peak at 75 years or older. The 1-year mortality without an appropriate treatment is with 15 to 20% extremely high. Pathogen detection is the essential diagnostic step and the basis for a sufficient antibiotic treatment. Geriatric patients have initially less elevated inflammatory parameters. Compared to younger patients. They have a longer length of hospital stay and take longer for CRP normalization. Even the outcome between conservative and operative treatment is comparable after one year. Patients with spinal instability, immobilizing pain, epidural abscess, and newly emerged neurological deficits should be considered for operative treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment of geriatric patients with pyogenic spondylodiscitis must take into account that these patients usually have multiple comorbidities. The main goals are resistance-based antibiotics and the shortest possible time of immobilization of the patient.

Evaluation of Classification Systems and Their Correlation With Clinical and Quality-of-life Parameters in Patients With Surgically Treated Spondylodiskitis.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical classifications for spondylodiscitis (SD) typically include radiologic features and the status of neurologic impairment. Clinical factors such as preoperative pain, function/disability, overall quality of life (QoL), and risk of recurrence and mortality, which are necessary for a comprehensive assessment of SD and measurement of treatment success, are not considered. There is a lack of external validation of SD classifications. The aim of this study was to validate classifications of SD and to correlate these classifications with the above clinical factors. METHODS: One hundred fourteen patients from a prospective SD register (2008-2020) with available imaging, preoperative neurologic status, backpain, function/disability data (Oswestry Disability Index and Core Outcome Measures Index), QoL data (Short Form 36, European Quality-of-life Questionnaire), and a 1-year follow-up were retrospectively classified according to Akbar, Homagk, and Pola classifications. Interrater reliability, correlation among classifications, and correlation between classifications and QoL were calculated. RESULTS: Interrater reliability was κ = 0.83 for Akbar, κ = 0.94 for Homagk, and κ = 0.99 for Pola. The correlation of Akbar with Pola and Homagk was moderate (ρ s = 0.47; ρ s = 0.46) and high between Pola and Homagk (ρ s = 0.7). No notable correlation was observed between any of the classifications and preoperative Oswestry Disability Index, Core Outcome Measures Index, QoL, mortality, and recurrence within 1 year. Only a weak correlation was observed between Homagk and preoperative leg pain and back pain. CONCLUSION: Available SD classifications have a very good interrater reliability and moderate-to-high correlation with each other but lack correlation with preoperative pain, function/disability, and overall QoL. Because these factors are important for a comprehensive assessment of SD in severity, decision making, and prognosis, they should be included in future SD classifications. This could allow for more comprehensive treatment algorithms. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II. Diagnostic study = prospective cohort study; development of diagnostic criteria. DATA AVAILABILITY: The data sets used and analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Specialized palliative care for hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection: an analysis of the LEOSS registry.

PURPOSE: Symptom control for patients who were severely ill or dying from COVID-19 was paramount while resources were strained and infection control measures were in place. We aimed to describe the characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 infected patients who received specialized palliative care (SPC) and the type of SPC provided in a larger cohort. METHODS: From the multi-centre cohort study Lean European Open Survey on SARS-CoV-2 infected patients (LEOSS), data of patients hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 infection documented between July 2020 and October 2021 were analysed. RESULTS: 273/7292 patients (3.7%) received SPC. Those receiving SPC were older and suffered more often from comorbidities, but 59% presented with an estimated life expectancy > 1 year. Main symptoms were dyspnoea, delirium, and excessive tiredness. 224/273 patients (82%) died during the hospital stay compared to 789/7019 (11%) without SPC. Symptom control was provided most common (223/273; 95%), followed by family and psychological support (50% resp. 43%). Personal contact with friends or relatives before or during the dying phase was more often documented in patients receiving SPC compared to patients without SPC (52% vs. 30%). CONCLUSION: In 3.7% of SARS-CoV-2 infected hospitalized patients, the burden of the acute infection triggered palliative care involvement. Besides complex symptom management, SPC professionals also focused on psychosocial and family issues and aimed to enable personal contacts of dying patients with their family. The data underpin the need for further involvement of SPC in SARS-CoV-2 infected patients but also in other severe chronic infectious diseases.

[Update bone infections]. / Update Knocheninfektionen.

Bone and joint infections are becoming of great concern in an elderly population with growing numbers of prosthetic joints and comorbidities. This paper summarizes recently published literature on periprosthetic joint infections, vertebral osteomyelitis and diabetic foot infections. According to a new study, in the presence of a hematogenous periprosthetic infection and other inserted joint prostheses that are unremarkable on clinical examination, further invasive or imaging diagnostics may not be necessary. Periprosthetic infections that occur late (> 3 months after joint installation) have a worse outcome. New studies tried to identify factors when prosthesis preservation might still be an option. A new randomized landmark trial from France failed to show non-inferiority for 6 versus 12 weeks of therapy length. Thus, it can be assumed that this will currently become the standard therapy length for all surgical modalities (retention or replacement). Vertebral osteomyelitis is a rather rare bone infection, but the incidence has continued to rise sharply in recent years. A retrospective study from Korea provides information on the distribution of pathogens in different age groups and with selected comorbidities; this could help in the selection of an empiric therapy when pathogen identification is not successful before starting the treatment. The guidelines by the "International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF)" have been updated with a slightly different classification. New practice recommendations of the German society of diabetology emphasize an early interdisciplinary interprofessional management. Empirical therapy continues to be based on the severity of the infection and other risk factors (such as previous therapies or ischemia). Microbiological diagnosis from tissue samples is described as superior to smears. According to a randomized pilot study, 3 weeks therapy length for osteomyelitis after debridement appears to be noninferior to 6 weeks.

Use of Sotrovimab in 14 Children with COVID-19: A Single-center Experience.

Children affected by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) with preexisting comorbidities are at risk of complications. Monoclonal antibodies prevent severe COVID-19 courses in adults but data on children are scarce. Here we report on the use of Sotrovimab in 14 children at risk of severe disease treated at the University of Cologne Children's Hospital. Tolerability was good and no infusion-related reactions were seen.

Choosing Wisely internationally - helpful recommendations for antimicrobial stewardship!

PURPOSE: Antimicrobial resistance poses a major threat to human health globally and antibiotic overuse is a main driver of resistance. Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) was developed to improve the rationale use of antibiotics. The Choosing Wisely campaign was initiated to ameliorate medical practice through avoidance of unnecessary diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Our objective was to give an overview on the Choosing Wisely recommendations related to AMS practices from a selection of different countries in order to define future needs. METHODS: We evaluated the seven countries already analyzed for Choosing Wisely recommendations related to topics of infectious medicine before. Finally, we included five of the former countries (Australia/New Zealand, Canada, Italy, Switzerland, and USA) and Germany with easily accessible recommendations and selected those related to six categories of AMS as following: diagnostics, indication, choice of antiinfective drugs, dosing, application and duration of therapy. RESULTS: In total, 213 recommendations could be extracted related to AMS for the six countries and were matched to the chosen categories. Interestingly, no recommendations were found for the category "dosing." Topics related to indication and diagnostics were most frequently found with 85 and 78 recommendations, respectively. Perioperative prophylaxis was a frequently addressed issue - both related to application, indication and duration. Avoiding antibiotic treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria and upper respiratory tract infections were central topics of all countries. CONCLUSION: AMS is an important strategy to fight increasing resistance and is frequently addressed by Choosing Wisely recommendations of different countries. Similar issues are considered important in the selected countries.

[Development and validation of potential structure indicators for clinical infectious disease (ID) care in German hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic]. / Entwicklung und Validierung potenzieller Strukturindikatoren zur Evaluierung des klinisch-infektiologischen Versorgungsangebots in deutschen Krankenhäusern während der COVID-19-Pandemie.

INTRODUCTION: This study describes the development and validation of structure indicators for clinical infectious disease (ID) care in German hospitals, which is important to adequately face the future challenges in ID medicine. METHODS: A team of experts developed the structure indicators in a three-stage, multicriteria decision-making process: (1) identification of potential structure indicators based on a literature review, (2) written assessment process, and (3) face-to-face discussion to reach consensus and final selection of appropriate structure indicators. A field study was conducted to assess the developed structure indicators. A score based on the structure indicators was determined for each hospital and validated via receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves using externally validated ID expertise (German Society of ID (DGI) Centre). RESULTS: Based on a list of 45 potential structure indicators, 18 suitable indicators were developed for clinical ID care structures in German hospitals. Out of these, ten key indicators were defined for the general and coronavirus disease 2019- (COVID-19-) specific clinical ID care structures. In the field survey of clinical ID care provision for COVID-19 patients in 40 German hospitals, the participating facilities achieved 0 to 9 points (median 4) in the determined score. The area under the ROC curve was 0.893 (95% CI: 0.797, 0.988; p < 0.001). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: The structure indicators developed within the framework of a transparent and established development process can be used in the future to both capture the current state and future developments of ID care quality in Germany and enable comparisons.

Impact of a pediatric infectious disease consultation service on timely step-down to oral antibiotic treatment for bone and joint infections.

PURPOSE: In recent years an earlier step down to oral antibiotic therapy has been advocated for numerous infections. Trained infectious disease specialists regularly consulting their colleagues may speed up the implementation of such recommendations into clinical practice and thus may improve treatment. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed bone and joint infections in children admitted to the University Hospital of Cologne between 2010 and 2021. We assessed clinical, imaging, and microbiological findings and treatment modalities. Additionally, we assessed both the impact of a newly implemented pediatric infectious diseases consultation service and publications on revised treatment recommendations by comparing antibiotic therapy in two periods (2010-2016 versus 2017 to 2021). RESULTS: In total, 29 children presented with osteomyelitis, 16 with bacterial arthritis and 7 with discitis. In period 2 (2017-2021) we observed shorter duration of intravenous treatment (p = 0.009) and a higher percentage of oral antibiotic treatment in relation to the total duration of antibiotics (25% versus 59%, p = 0.007) compared to period 1 (2010-2016). Yet, no differences were identified for the total length of antibiotic treatment. Additionally, biopsies or synovial fluid samples were retrieved and cultured in more children in period 2 (p = 0.077). The main pathogen identified in osteomyelitis and bacterial arthritis was Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), diagnosis was confirmed predominantly with MRI. CONCLUSION: Recent guidelines addressing the safety of an earlier step-down (to oral) antibiotic therapy have influenced clinical practice in the treatment of bone and joint infections in our hospital. A newly implemented pediatric infectious diseases consultation service might have accelerated this progress resulting in a faster step down to oral treatment.

Brain abscess with Ureaplasma parvum in a patient with granulomatosis with polyangiitis.

PURPOSE: Ureaplasma species are associated with urogenital infections, infertility and adverse pregnancy outcomes as well as neonatal infections. Involvement of the central nervous system in adults is extremely rare. We report an unusual case of a brain abscess secondary to otitis media with Ureaplasma parvum in a patient with granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA). METHODS: Imaging and laboratory findings, treatment decisions, and outcome of this case are explicated. RESULTS: A young adult with GPA presented with progredient earache after ambulant diagnosis of otitis media. Despite different courses of broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy, she developed meningoencephalitis due to mastoiditis following temporal abscess formation. Mastoidectomy and neurosurgical abscess removal were performed. Standard cultures of cerebrospinal fluid, blood and intracranial abscess material, as well as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for common bacterial and viral meningitis pathogens remained negative. Only eubacterial PCR of intracranial abscess material returned positive for Ureaplasma parvum. The patient finally improved under antibiotic therapy with moxifloxacin and doxycycline. CONCLUSION: Ureaplasma species are rare causative pathogens in immunocompromised patients. They should be considered in patients with humoral immunodeficiencies with culture-negative infections failing standard therapy. Eubacterial PCR should be performed in early states of infection in these patients for immediate diagnosis and initiation of appropriate treatment to prevent adverse outcomes.